Analysis
of ‘Moonlight Sonata’ by Ludwig van Beethoven
Sonata
quasi una fantasia, Piano sonata No.14 in C# minor Op. 27, N.2
Ludwig
van Beethoven was a pianist and a composer who was born in Bonn, Germany year
and died in Vienna, Austria (1770-1827). He was taught piano and violin from a
very young age from his father. As a teenager he was sent to Vienna for unknown
reasons but there he shortly studied with Mozart. After the death of his
parents he became a permanent resident in Vienna. There he established himself
as a composer. Although at this point already starting to lose his hearing and
he actually composed his most important works during the last ten years of his
life, when he was mostly deaf. Some of the most famous pieces of Beethoven are;
Adelaide, Op. 46, Pathetique Sonata, No. 8 Op. 30, Eroica Symphony (Third) Op. 55,
Fifth Symphony, Op. 67 and the piece being analysed moonlight sonata.
This
piece that has become one of the most well know pieces of classical music since
the about 200 years ago when it was written got its name ‘Moonlight sonata’
from a music critique Ludwig Rellstab because of its eerie presence after
Beethoven had died. It is said that
Beethoven was inspired to write it while visiting Lake Balaton located in
Hungary. Although it is a sonata it does not follow the traditional form of a
classical period sonata. Instead of this fast-slow-fast-fast layout it
progresses towards a fast tempo over the span of all the three movements.
Starting from the first movement ‘Adagio sostenuto’ which means ‘sustained in
slow time’, to ‘Allegretto’ meaning ‘fairly quickly’ and to the third and final
movement of the piece ‘Presto agitato’ roughly meaning ‘quick agitation’ As per
usual for sonatas the first movement is the most well known and most played,
there are ten times the amount of recordings on it than there is of the whole
piece. Moonlight sonata is one of the main pieces that marks the transitional
period between the classical and romantic era in which Beethoven as a composer
was predominant figure.
1st movement – Adagio
sostenuto
The
beginning movement of this sonata is played in C# minor and is in fact common
time and two beats to the bar. It appears to be four to the bar because of the
triplet subvision in the right-hand which persist as an ostinato throughout. The
movement is traditionally performed slowly although when you take in to
consideration the adagio instruction and apply it to two instead of four beats
to the bar its effects are far from adagio. The first four bars are the
introduction. It has a descending bass-line that characterises it. Beethoven
has borrowed this bass-line from Albinonis’ Adagio. After this starts the
entreating polyrhythmic motif that makes up the main theme; the one that
everyone can recognise. These four beats of polyrhythm and perpetual triplets are
borrowed from Mozart, much like many other aspects of this piece. This
particular feature is from The Commendatore’s death scene in Don Giovanni. Other obvious feature that Beethoven couldn’t
help but copy from Mozart is the tonic major-to-minor progression that initiate
the modulation to the second subject. This was used by Mozart 25 years earlier
in Sonata n.4 in E major. This first movement includes one of the most
discussed and argued notation. There is a fair amount of disagreement in the
matter of the 12th bar’s second triplet group. Players are
disagreeing whether to play c or a b. Though there is a dispute on this there
is a clear answer to this. It is to be played as c. The simple reason for this
is the counterpoint rule of the classical era. It states that two separate
voices mustn’t move in parallel octaves or fifths unless other one is doubling.
Because the bass line is already doubled, the triplet cannot double it so it is
c. This first movement is the one that follows the guidelines of classical
sonata the most, but it still holds a couple of quirks. Its unusual tonal
progression is not common in classical period sonatas and this is most likely
the reason why Beethoven called the piece ‘Sonata quasi una fantasia’. Fantasia
often meaning that the piece is of free form. Also in the exposition the second
subject isn’t dominant as it should be in classical form. It is in B minor,
which isn’t even a parallel key. The movement ends with the main motif gets
darker and forth telling of dimness ahead as it moves in to left-hand ground.
2nd
Movement –Allegretto
This movement differs from the
other two quite drastically. It is cheery and light-hearted. It creates a break
in the intenseness of the other two movements, it’s like the eye of the storm where
the storm is behind and ahead, yet it is sunny and bright. Allegretto is played
in D flat major, which is the more easily notated enharmonic equivalent to C#
major; the parallel major of the first movement’s C# minor. Even with the
slight majority of movement in piano frequent sforzandos and forte-pianos keep
the melody cheerful. This light-hearted classical harmony’s main motif isn’t
really much of a melody and is repeated 20 times in the course of two minutes.
The trio on par with the allegretto and the two repeats of two eight-bar
sequences bring some contrast to this part and after this is the obvious
allegretto repeated da capo after the trio. This movement is the shortest of
them all with a bar count of only 60 bars and duration of two minutes.
3rd
Movement –Presto agitato
The third and final movement of
this sonata is a fierce and stormy piece in C# minor. It is the weightiest of
all of the movements and a part of Beethoven’s experiment in locating the most
important movement last. It’s heavy and fiery feel is created by many fast
arpeggios and strongly accented notes. Presto agitato starts off with the same
notes as the 1st movement with an added agitato instruction. After
this it modifies the three note motif in a way that the rhythmic pattern with
the second note on the weakest beat keeps the initial core harmonic structure
the same. This is repeated six times. The theme continuous until there’s a
Neapolitan flattened supertonic; this is from the 3rd bar of the 1st
movement. After this it continues until it meets it again but an octave lower
this time around. Shortly after this finally the melody meets another theme
which leads it to the closing subject. In this the exposition is repeated as
expected but the development and recapitulation are not. The development kicks
off with first subject arpeggios in tonic major but shortly turns into the
cantable theme from the 2nd subject which repositions into the left
hand, there jumping up and down until meeting the long dominant pedal point
that is predicting the reprise, much like in the 1st movement but
without the diminished seventh chord. The reprise basically duplicates the
whole of the exposition excluding standard key changes and minor alterations.
After this we finally get to the final ascent that has not one but two climax
points one after another. The start of this ascent creates an illusion of
entering another development section. This shows us why only exposition was
repeated. The whole second part is twice as long as the exposition and also the
climax wouldn’t work a second time. The first climax is based on the first
subject as expected while the second climax is more elaborate and emotive. It
develops on the second subject motif before rolling into triplet arpeggios. The
ultimate climax is a quick pace intricate ‘mess’. Up and down several times up
through a chromatic scale, trill, descending again in an almost improvisation
figuration and after that we come to a grinding halt, then adagio. Tempo I piu
tranquillo, piano. Then a pedal point returns for six bars, pianissimo. Then
presto, forte. A final descend to the arpeggio, sforzando descend and two
blast, fortissimo, senza pedale. This might be the darkness and blackness the 1st
movement’s ending predicted.
The moonlight sonata is as a whole
a piece that with the first look seems simple and straight forward, yet when
looked at more closely it has a lot of small but important and revolutionary
features in it. It is most definitely important piece of music in the
transition to romantic from classical period.